At the End of My Rope.
Every time I hear John Kerry or his surrogates try to explain how his position on Iraq has been “consistent all along†I could scream. You’ve heard it all already (“I voted for the ‘authority’ only, but Bush ‘rushed to war’ and lied about WMDs…blah, blahâ€), so there is no need to lay it all out again. He has spent the last year in the enviable position of being able to sit on the sidelines, criticize the entry into the war and carp at the President’s every move to prosecute the war.
Let’s just suppose that when we took Baghdad, we had found 20 warehouses full of nuclear weapons. Here’s my question. Does anyone think that John Kerry wouldn’t have elbowed his way to the front of the line to brag about his vote FOR the war? [/rhetorical question]
Careful, Jim. I’m getting a little worried about that great farookin’ hair.
I’d hate to see it all pulled out.
Comment by Craig — October 31, 2004 @ 3:35 pm
John Kerry is a Lying Sack Of Shit.
LSOS Period.
Comment by Sam — October 31, 2004 @ 4:53 pm
KERRY Well, let me tell you straight up: I’ve never changed my mind about Iraq. I do believe Saddam Hussein was a threat. I always believed he was a threat. Believed it in 1998 when Clinton was president. I wanted to give Clinton the power to use force if necessary.
Second Debate
*************************************************
EDWARDS: I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country, and I think Iraq and Saddam Hussein present the most serious and most imminent threat.
audio clip
http://homepage.mac.com/imminentthreat/.cv/imminentthreat/Public/WireTap_recording001.aif-link.aif
**************************************************
Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option.
Bush State of the Union Address
Of the three men above which could be considered the greates liars?
Comment by Dan Kauffman — October 31, 2004 @ 5:45 pm
KERRY Well, let me tell you straight up: I’ve never changed my mind about Iraq. I do believe Saddam Hussein was a threat. I always believed he was a threat. Believed it in 1998 when Clinton was president. I wanted to give Clinton the power to use force if necessary.
Second Debate
*************************************************
EDWARDS: I think Iraq is the most serious and imminent threat to our country, and I think Iraq and Saddam Hussein present the most serious and most imminent threat.
audio clip
http://homepage.mac.com/imminentthreat/.cv/imminentthreat/Public/WireTap_recording001.aif-link.aif
**************************************************
Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option.
Bush State of the Union Address
Of the three men above which could be considered the greates liars?
Comment by Dan Kauffman — October 31, 2004 @ 5:46 pm
Dan–
Thanks.
Comment by Jim - Parkway Rest Stop — October 31, 2004 @ 8:39 pm